We truly admire the boldness of some to stand up to defend a non-Scholar, 20th century "thinker" and "literary writer" who:

Made Takfir of some of the Companions of Allaah's Messenger whilst reviling and belittling others, mocked one of the Prophets of Allaah, took the aqidah of the Khawarij into a whole new ballgame (every one is a kaafir on the entire planet except me and those upon this doctrine of mine), incorporated the manifestos of secular atheist Jews into his methodology, negated Allah's Uluww in numerous instances in his commentary, took the way of the Jahmiyyah in negating istiwaa from the angle of negating "hawaadith", cast aspersions upon the Sunnah in general, rejected aahaad hadeeth in aqidah, spoke with the aqidah of the Jabariyyah in the manner and style of those who speak with Wahdat ul-Wujood, denied the Arsh, denied the Kursee, denied Allaah spoke to Moses with speech that Moses heard, spoke with the creation of the Qur'an, and spoke multiple different statements entailing kufr and more ...

And then to equate such a man with the hadith giants Ibn Hajar and an-Nawawi and to put him alongside Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Abdul-Wahhab as "Imaams of Guidance" that takes bravery and guts. In recognition of such bravery, we will be presenting a series of competitions and quizzes in which we hope this ardent desire to defend baatil and its people at all costs and lengths will allow us to experience an altogether different level of being thunderstruck and slack-jawed. So here goes ...